Whose Side Is the Media On? Black Lives Matter or American Citizens and Business Owners?

An article in the July 31, 2020. Chicago Tribune "South Side marijuana dispensary could reopen" by Abdel Jiminez.

"Two-month closure forced by unrest."

Okay, "unrest."  What exactly is that?  Did someone not get enough sleep?  Did a vocal confrontation take place?

Let's see.  Two months before July 31 would put you at the end of May, beginning of June.  Was there something going on in Chicago that could be considered "unrest" at that time?

Let's continue with the article and see.

"Mission South Chicago marijuana dispensary (you can now buy marijuana legally in Illinois to help raise money for the broke state) will reopen after closing for two months due to damage it suffered during civil unrest following George Floyd's death in late May."

Oh yes.  There was that "civil unrest."  Only I would have to call it rioting and looting.  Who was rioting, looting and committing arson?  And, what happened to this marijuana store?

A group by the name of Black Lives Matter was having demonstrations in Chicago which the media and mayor described as peaceful.  Then, it wasn't so peaceful.  It is kind of funny that whenever Black Lives Matter hits the streets, often we have that "civil unrest."

Don't you think that "civil unrest" is a much nicer name for "riot" or "looting?"  Why would a respected newspaper like the Tribune just call what happened "civil unrest?"

Is Black Lives Matter Another Name for Rioting, Looting and Burning Especially in Light of Them Having Nothing to Say About the Black on Black Shootings in Chicago?  --Old Secesh